Monday, June 25, 2012

Chanel Fall 2012 Chanel Lumiere d'Artifices Beiges - Review, Swatches, Pictures


When Kathy Shoreman from Neiman Marcus e-mailed me a picture of the new Chanel Fall collection I had to sit down. Not only did it include 5 new shades of single eyeshadows, a new quad eyeshadow palette, a new JC Blush, New Glosses and Rouge Coco and Rouge Coco Shines...which by the way would have been enough, this collection also contained a new highlighter that didn't cost $90 freakin dollars. (Sorry, you know my weakness for highlighters and the more expensive they become, the more grumpy I become)  Said highlighter in the Chanel Fall 2012 Collection is....(Drum roll)


Chanel Lumiere d'Artifices Beiges.  Que? or should I say Quoi? (That's French for "What".  I took French for 4 years in school and I remember none of it. I actually had to verify that quoi was correct on google translate because the lyrics for Front 242's song Manhunter 


took priority over French vocabulary)  Chanel Lumiere d'Artifices Beiges roughly translates to Illuminating Powder with Shimmer in Beige.  Which goes to show you the value of a good education because Google translate says it means "Fireworks light of Belgians".  *snort*  I bet the Belgians are none too pleased.


Anyhoo.


About the powder.


First and foremost I will tell you up front. the shimmer you see on the brand new product is overspray. A glittery top coat which disappears once the product is used for the first time.  The powder underneath looks quite matte and, I'll be frank, quite dull. But as I will explain in a moment, that's not a problem and the dull looking powder is a red herring, so to speak.

image from http://www.bellasugar.com/

Secondly, I would like to point out that Chanel is recycling powder molds. This is the exactly same sequined look as the 2006 Holiday collection Chanel Lumiere d'Artifices Metallic Eyeshadow. As you can see in the picture above, the metallic limited edition eyeshadow had the sequined look with silver pewter and gold metallic colors. This however, was metallic to the core and not an overspray like the current Chanel Lumiere d'Artifices Beiges offered today.  It's great that I can remember an eyeshadow from 2006 but can't remember 4 years of French class.  I guess we all know where my priorities are.  Despite the re-use of the sequin motif the Chanel Chanel Lumiere d'Artifices Beiges is still a successful product
.

Thirdly, the quality of the powder of this product is exceptional.  It is finer than pixie dust.  For those not familiar with the quality of pixie dust it is slightly finer than that of Sandman Sand and Fairy Dust.  There has been a long drawn out legal battle over the patent of Pixie Dust. The Fairies contend that they had the patent first and have been manufacturing this grade of dust well before the Pixies.  However, the Pixies say that their patent is different and that their dust is superior and not open to embedding malicious code like the Fairy dust is.  In fact, the Fairy dust is considered bulky and slow and not as dynamic as the sleeker more adaptable Pixie dust that is being used today.  I have to agree. One does not need a Bachelors degree in Computer Science to operate Pixie dust, but it sure seems that way when dealing with Fairy dust, especially when you get the dreaded blue screen of death.  Plus Pixie dust does not crash as often as Fairy dust.  Are we still talking about cosmetics?

With overspray removed

With overspray
Fourthly and lastly, the Chanel Lumiere d'Artifices Beiges is glowy.  Yes. Glowy! (Ah ha! The red herring!)  The powder despite looking matte in the pan has a very fine level of shimmer that is not glittery.  The powder, when applied to the cheeks, dusted down the bridge of the nose and carefully dotted over the eyebrows, gives the face a golden ethereal glow.  


The color of the powder as seen in the swatch above is golden and glowy. It is a heavy swatch applied with a cosmetics sponge, but I did this to show the color and depth of the powder.  As you can see it is a buildable color and could be used on almost any skin tone from light to dark.

Do you NEED this?  Well if you want a more obvious highlighter that is more frosty then no. But to anyone that wishes that they a) should have picked  that Estee Lauder Limited edition powder that I featured on Highlighters You Can't Have (because this is a nice dupe for it) or b) Want to have a nice natural soft glow reminiscent to the golden hues of an Autumn twilight when the leaves on the trees blaze in orange, red and yellow and the light from the sun spreads a golden cast to the land, then YES! You NEED this!  I have yet to see this show up on chanel.com or neimanmarcus.com, so if You MUST have this NOW you can call Kathy Shoreman at 571-533-4972 and place your order right away before this one sells out. It is limited edition, after all, and you never know, the Fairies might win that patent lawsuit and this powder could be recalled!*  I purchased this for about $60 USD but to be honest I can't remember the exact amount and my receipt is missing, Probably buried at the bottom of my purse.

*no it couldn't. That's a joke. Sadly I have to put in a disclaimer about said joke because some people don't have a sense of humor and others are gullible.

This post contains an affiliate link. Affiliate links gives the Pink Sith Blog a commission when you click and purchase something from that link. It's just like a retail associate who works on a commission basis. When you shop through an affiliate link on Pink Sith you help support the site!

26 comments:

  1. So I can definitely see that mold being sequins on the holiday collection, but honestly on this powder it reads more cheerios. Looks beautiful on the skin though.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL! I does look like Cheerios!! Good call.

      Delete
    2. To me, it looks like the smallest O's in Spaghetti-O's.

      Delete
  2. I actually love the pattern on the top! This looks gorgeous.
    Your expertise on fantasy creature dust is award winning!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you! I double minored in Fantasy creature Dust and dirty jokes in college.

      Delete
  3. Since I am a patent agent, and write patents all day long, I really enjoyed your creative joke. Hope other people do too.
    I'm looking for a matte red-based bronzer, or a brown blush that could be used as a bronzer (because I am so damn pale and PINK). If you happen to have any of those, could you please do a review of them?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hee! Yay! So I made some sort of sense with my Patent lawsuit joke!
      Oh and I think I have a blush for you that might work. Let me check my "stash" and I'll review it shortly!

      Delete
  4. Not to ruin your joke, but is there a chance you typed Lumiere d'Artifices Belges instead of Lumiere d'Artifices Beiges? What remains of my two years of High School French tells me this might be why Google Translate told you it was Belgian. (sorry for the semi-informed pedantry,I must have missed my calling..)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi! No. Not at all. I actually checked twice. I think google translate had no word for Beiges so it went to the next "logical" translation. LOL. Belges!

      Delete
  5. I frackin' LOVE your disclaimer. And may have to order this powder. Damn you.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This almost looks like it could function as a subtle bronzer for us ghostly gals. It doesn't seem to lean to orange? right?..... Oh I'm in trouble!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's right! In fact I'm wearing it as a bronzer today! No orange! you are in trouble!

      Delete
  7. This is sooo pretty!! *sigh* another 100 dollars down the drain. Yes, its almost double the price in Australia... :(

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. *cough* *choke* *spittake* $100 AUD? Holy crap. It's nice but not $100 nice. Dang!

      Delete
    2. Hahaha yes, Elvira it is 100 dollars nice!!! I think we are conditioned to pay at least 50% more for goods than the rest of the world LOL

      We pay ~22 dollars for Revlon lip butters here. I'm so lucky to have friends in the US to send me things :)

      Delete
  8. I just found your blog and I like it!! I love Chanel,I think their make up products are just awesome! I start following!! I invite you to my blog, and if you like it you can follow me back!
    un kiss
    Rocío

    ReplyDelete
  9. Cheerios + subtle highlighter = win.

    ReplyDelete
  10. The pattern on it bothers me, looks like a disease gives me the hebie jebies

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh my! Sorry about that. Well looks like Chanel saved you some money! LOL

      Delete
  11. Ew! I'm with Nancy on this one, it looks so gross. The pattern reminds me of that parasite infested breast hoax email (it's on Snopes under "breast rash"). Do not want.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. YIKES! A parasite? Sound like the infamous Lotus Boob hoax. I can understand your aversion. But I also find it amusing. Well. At least you won't have to spend the money!

      Delete
  12. DEATH TO OVERSPRAY. How can I be expected to sparkle hard if the glitter is only on the surface? Whatever, Chanel.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Your blog is awesome! Amazing reviews and you totally crack me up! Thank you and keep em coming!

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Progrids

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...